Habitat Regulations Assessment

Object

Representation ID: 18

Received: 06/03/2024

Respondent: Mrs Marie Jackson

I am concerned that subjective opinions will be skewed to 'fit' the narrative therefore lacking transparency and open dialogue.

Object

Representation ID: 55

Received: 08/03/2024

Respondent: Mrs Elaine Hume

You have only included nationally recognised habitats. What local habitat mapping will you be doing and which ones will you respect.

Object

Representation ID: 68

Received: 08/03/2024

Respondent: Mrs Elaine Hume

1.21 – 1.22 Conservation of habitat and species. What wildlife surveys will be conducted, when and who by? How long will this take to complete in all sites? I a talking about the local habitats not the designated large sites.

Support

Representation ID: 275

Received: 18/03/2024

Respondent: Miss Carys Vaughan

I support the intention here but SKDC need to factor in the impact on a neighbouring county’s biodiversity when putting forward development proposals. By acknowledging the high biodiversity value and importance of Quarry Farm the proposals for Stamford North should not have been carried forward to the stage it is at now.

Object

Representation ID: 986

Received: 23/04/2024

Respondent: Dr Ray Butler

I cannot support any ‘plan’ that advocates widespread destruction of the local countryside.