Object

Representation ID: 130

Received: 09/03/2024

Respondent: Mrs Marie Jackson

Propose changing the wording 'should to must'

Support

Representation ID: 131

Received: 09/03/2024

Respondent: Mrs Marie Jackson

I believe this should be an essential requirement

Object

Representation ID: 395

Received: 06/04/2024

Respondent: Mr John Bavister

e. Car parking provision should be sufficient for the location and type of development, the wording of sufficient car parking spacing is not measurable. Define the number of car parking spaces per dwelling linked to the number of bedrooms and type of property.

Time and time again in chamber discussions and debate pick up on number of car parking spaces. Immediately discounted by official statement the LP does not specify the number of car spaces per type of dwelling.
Here is an opportunity to specify, yet again leaving the outcome ambiguous with the contestable word Sufficient

Object

Representation ID: 752

Received: 20/04/2024

Respondent: Jane Bateman

New housing needs to show that it is as energy efficient as possible - all new houses should have solar panels, heat pumps and electric charging points.
Warehouses and distribution units should also have solar panels - they are ideal as they are usually rather unattractive buildings (square and with flat roofs) and located near road transport links.

Object

Representation ID: 1057

Received: 23/04/2024

Respondent: Dr Ray Butler

I cannot support any ‘plan’ that advocates widespread destruction of the local countryside.

Support

Representation ID: 1118

Received: 24/04/2024

Respondent: Persimmon Homes East Midlands

Paragraph 1 sets out that all development proposes will be expected to ‘adhere’ to Design Codes and SPD’s. Persimmon Homes are of the view that the word ‘adhere’ be replaced with ‘in accordance with’, this wording would allow some flexibility in the application of this policy. For the same reason, Persimmon Homes would also suggest that the paragraph starting ‘All major development (as defined in the Glossary must demonstrate compliance with..’ be reworded to ‘All major developments (as defined in the Glossary) shall be in accordance with …’.

Object

Representation ID: 1280

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Mr Steven Giullari

Different Characters within areas should be recognised

Object

Representation ID: 1352

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Mr John Ingamells

Agent: Mather Jamie

The set of compliance documents are not mandatory, adopted documents. The expectation that all major development must demonstrate compliance is overly onerous. This section of the policy should be re worded as follows:

All major development (as defined in the Glossary) should have regard to (and any subsequent versions):
a. Neighbourhood Plan policies;
b. Manual for Streets guidance and relevant Lincolnshire County Council guidance;
c. Village design statements, where approved by the Council; and
d. For new residential proposals, development should perform positively against Building for a Healthy Life.

Object

Representation ID: 1376

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Mr John Ingamells

Agent: Mather Jamie

The set of compliance documents are not mandatory, adopted documents. The expectation that all major development must demonstrate compliance is overly onerous. This section of the policy should be re worded as follows:
All major development (as defined in the Glossary) must demonstrate compliance with should have regard to (and any subsequent versions):
a. Neighbourhood Plan policies;
b. Manual for Streets guidance and relevant Lincolnshire County Council guidance;
c. Village design statements, where approved by the Council; and
d. For new residential proposals, development should perform positively against Building for a Healthy Life.

Support

Representation ID: 1395

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: The Woodland Trust

We support measures to require trees as part of good design. We recommend strengthening this policy by requiring a minimum tree canopy cover from development sites, of at least 20% and ideally 30%, to make a positive contribution to achieving an acceptable average tree cover district-wide, and focusing this on the areas in greatest need.

Object

Representation ID: 1410

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: The Len Pick Trust c/o Mather Jamie

Agent: Mather Jamie

The set of compliance documents are not mandatory, adopted documents. The expectation that all major development must demonstrate compliance is overly onerous. This section of the policy should be re worded as follows: All major development (as defined in the Glossary) must demonstrate compliance with should have regard to (and any subsequent versions): a. Neighbourhood Plan policies; b. Manual for Streets guidance and relevant Lincolnshire County Council guidance; c. Village design statements, where approved by the Council; and d. For new residential proposals, development should perform positively against Building for a Healthy Life.

Object

Representation ID: 1475

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Mr Tom Upson

The proposed removal of the acoustic bund as part of the Stamford North development is the OPPOSITE of Good Quality Design. The 'mitigation' the developer is proposing of extra houses crammed in to provide an acoustic barrier to existing residents is totally unacceptable. By the admission of those proposing it, this will create new cramped homes exposed to continuous noise and light pollution from Borderville Sports Centre and the link road. This is BAD QUALITY DESIGN.

Support

Representation ID: 1510

Received: 17/04/2024

Respondent: National Trust

The positive principles of this policy are noted, which acts to reinforce the principles of good design across the built environment. This is with an appropriate appreciation of local context, identity and character as guiding principles. It is hoped that this policy area helps support sustainable and holistic development

Support

Representation ID: 1650

Received: 24/04/2024

Respondent: Market Deeping Town Council

Councillors are aware that the Deepings Neighbourhood Plan Group has commissioned a substantial project to produce a Design Code for The Deepings. This work is due to be completed in summer 2024. Deepings has experienced far too much ordinary and uninspiring development and the promotion of good design is a mission close to our hearts. We very much welcome the policies that support us to refuse development that is not well designed.

Object

Representation ID: 1665

Received: 24/04/2024

Respondent: The Deepings Neighbourhood Plan Group

Reword to offer clarity on where these are Building Reg issues. Not consistent with Climate Change chapter.

Object

Representation ID: 1691

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Deeping St James Parish Council

Reword to offer clarity on where these are Building Reg issues. Not consistent with Climate Change chapter.

Support

Representation ID: 1714

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Historic England

Policy DE1 is welcomed.

Support

Representation ID: 1755

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Lincolnshire County Council

LCC welcomes the Policy DE1 approach to car parking that is ‘sufficient for the location and type of development’, and that ‘spaces should be easy to use, fit for purpose and large enough to cater for a wide range of users’. specifically, it is supported that each development is
considered on its merits, particularly with relation to location and public transport provision. Where insufficient car parking is proposed, LCC as Highways Authority will object to the relevant planning application.

Object

Representation ID: 1784

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Bourne Town Council

Strongly objects to the statement that ‘All major development (as defined in the Glossary) must demonstrate compliance with (and any subsequent versions) Neighbourhood Plans’. While Policy DE1 identifies an extensive raft of design principles, greater clarity is needed to understand how these will be applied. It is assumed that. this clarity is to be provided by the proposed preparation of a Design Code for the District.

Support

Representation ID: 1792

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: NHS Property Services

NHSPS fully support policies that promote carbon neutral development, and the securing of financial contributions where on-site carbon mitigation requirements cannot be met. In considering the implementation of policies related to net zero, we would highlight that NHS property could benefit from carbon offset funds. This would support the NHS to reach the goal of becoming the world’s first net zero healthcare provider. Support the inclusion of policies that support healthy lifestyles. Suggests the inclusion of a separate comprehensive policy on health and wellbeing in the Local Plan which includes guidelines and requirements for the implementation of Health Impact Assessment’s (HIAs), and encourage the Council to engage with the NHS on this matter ahead of the Regulation 19 document being prepared. Provides suggestions on specific policy requirements to promote healthy developments.

Object

Representation ID: 1820

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Cllr Penny Milnes

Is it possible to include very small or individual developments in sensitive locations to be referred to the design team?
Is there a reference and an approach to the new NPPF policies,
para 139b and para 84e and whether they should trump other local plan policies such as SP5? Whether community support is required? Definition of ‘outstanding’ design?

Support

Representation ID: 1845

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Buckminster and Norwich Hub Ltd

Agent: Godfrey-Payton & Co

Support the policy DE1 and looks forward to commenting upon any Design Guides and Codes the council consult on in the normal way. If a particularly expensive design solution is required by the council then it would be reasonable for that related costs to be taken into account in any viability assessment.
Para b - MMC may need to be increasingly employed to achieve Zero Carbon buildings. It could be that there is not a neat fit with point b and it could be the same for points 1. a and c. MMC may be a better fit with point 6 a-c.
Sustainable Building and Construction 11.6 to 11.9. 11.9 text - It would be reasonable that any costs related to going beyond mandatory Building Regulations requirements be taken account of in the Whole Plan Viability Assessment.
It is noted and welcomed that the final policy, will be informed by a Whole Plan Viability Assessment which will accompany the plan.

Object

Representation ID: 1957

Received: 22/04/2024

Respondent: Natural England

Natural England suggests that reference should be made within this policy of the Natural England Green Infrastructure Planning and Design Guide 2023 which provides evidence based practical guidance on how to plan and design good green infrastructure. It complements the National Model Design Code and National Design Guide and can be used to help planners and designers develop local design guides and codes with multifunctional green infrastructure at the heart. This will help to inspire the creation of healthier, nature-rich, climate resilient and thriving places to live, learn, work and play. We suggest that the GI design guide should be included in the list of supporting evidence.

Object

Representation ID: 1994

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Mrs Bridget Rosewell

The Neighbourhood Plan laid weight on the need to promote quality design which reflects the character of the village. I note that the Draft Plan appears to consider that only major developments need meet design guidance which the Neighbourhood Plan applies to all development whether large or small.

Support

Representation ID: 2070

Received: 22/04/2024

Respondent: South Lincolnshire Green Party

Is interesting. It has been amended and we hope it is adhered to.

Support

Representation ID: 2083

Received: 23/04/2024

Respondent: The Crown Estate

Agent: Savills

TCE support the principle of Policy DE1.

Support

Representation ID: 2106

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Buckminster

Policy DE1 which is summarised in the boxes on pages 120, 121, 122, and 123 is supported.
Moden Methods of Construction (MMC) may need to be increasingly employed to achieve Zero Carbon buildings. It could be that there is not a neat fit with point b and it could be the same for points 1. a and c. MMC may be a better fit with point 6 a-c.

Object

Representation ID: 2138

Received: 24/04/2024

Respondent: Greater Lincolnshire Nature Partnership, Natural England and Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust

It is felt that reference should be made within this policy of the Natural England Green Infrastructure Planning and Design Guide 2023 which provides evidence based practical guidance on how to plan and design good green infrastructure. It complements the National Model Design Code and National Design Guide and can be used to help planners and designers develop local design guides and codes with multifunctional green infrastructure at the heart. This will help to inspire the creation of healthier, nature-rich, climate resilient and thriving places to live, learn, work and play. It is suggested that the Green Infrastructure design guide should be included in the list of supporting evidence.

Object

Representation ID: 2159

Received: 23/04/2024

Respondent: National Gas

Agent: National Gas

To ensure that Policy DE1 is consistent with national policy requests the inclusion of

“x. taking a comprehensive and co-ordinated approach to development including respecting existing site constraints including utilities situated within sites.”

Object

Representation ID: 2163

Received: 23/04/2024

Respondent: National Grid UK

Agent: Avison Young

To ensure that Policy DE1 Promoting Good Quality Design is consistent with national policy we would request the inclusion of a policy strand such as:

“p. take a comprehensive and co-ordinated approach to development including respecting existing site constraints including utilities situated within sites.”