Object

Representation ID: 153

Received: 09/03/2024

Respondent: Mrs Marie Jackson

I question why the proposal uses the wording 'should' rather than 'will' or 'must'.

Object

Representation ID: 323

Received: 03/04/2024

Respondent: Barrowby Parish Council

This development falls wholly within the Parish of Barrowby, it is not inside the Grantham boundary, as such all statists relating to the dwellings within this development are incorrect throughout the entire document. As the document is a policy document we would like to see these amendments made and the statistics republished correctly
Map 3.6
12.21
SKPR280 references
Section 12, especially
12.58

Object

Representation ID: 417

Received: 09/04/2024

Respondent: Barrowby Parish Council

This development falls wholly within the Parish of Barrowby. It is not inside the Grantham boundary, and so all statistics relating to the dwellings within this development are incorrect throughout the entire document. As the document is a policy document, the Parish Council would like to see these amendments made and the statistics republished correctly Map 3.6 12.21 SKPR280 references Section 12, especially 12.58

Object

Representation ID: 1068

Received: 23/04/2024

Respondent: Dr Ray Butler

Awful, must be stopped.

Object

Representation ID: 1635

Received: 24/04/2024

Respondent: Sports England

In addition to comments on Policy H1 - Housing Allocations.

There is a need for the development principles to include the provision of new sports facilities and playing fields within the site and/or contributions towards off-site provision.

Support

Representation ID: 1719

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Historic England

criteria h) is welcomed.

Support

Representation ID: 1848

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Buckminster and Norwich Hub Ltd

Agent: Godfrey-Payton & Co

Buckminster and NH support the adjacent development and are working together on utilities including electrical supplies, drainage for foul and storm water across Poplar Farm, and connecting up roads, cycleways and footpaths between Rectory Farm and Poplar Farm.

The text on page 146 sets out: Any application must accord with the Rectory Farm Supplementary Planning Document adopted November 2021. That SPD covers similar topics to the joint working as between the Rectory Farm and Poplar Farm owners/developers. i.e. the need to connect up the roads, cycleways and footpaths between the two developments. Similar objectives are achieved in the Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan consultation.

Support

Representation ID: 1961

Received: 22/04/2024

Respondent: Natural England

We would reiterate the importance of establishing a connected network of high quality green infrastructure at the earliest stage of the planning process.

Support

Representation ID: 2320

Received: 23/04/2024

Respondent: National Highways

The allocation sits immediately adjacent to the north-east quadrant of the A1/A52 Barrowby junction. The Strategic Transport Assessment supporting the Plan should identify the cumulative traffic impacts of growth on the A1/A52 junction in particular. Consideration may need to be given to how this allocation might affect the longer-term ability to deliver future highways improvements given that the site abuts the junction. In addition, as the site sits adjacent to the A1 trunk road, proposals will be considered in relation to any potential boundary impacts for instance drainage and geotechnical matters. Planning applications would also need to be accompanied by assessments which consider noise and air quality impacts from the adjacent A1 trunk road.

Our comments for Rectory Farm Phase 3 are the broadly the same as those for Rectory Farm Phase 2 although we note that the need for a Masterplan has already been identified under policy point a. We also welcome policy point m which sets out that the impacts on the SRN must be identified and mitigated.
It is also noted that this allocation shares a common boundary with the SRN and whilst we have no objections in principle to this allocation, planning applications will need to demonstrate their impact on National Highways network and assets, and where necessary, provide appropriate mitigation.

Support

Representation ID: 2361

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Defence Infrastructure Organisation Safeguarding Team

- Development of, or exceeding, 91.4m in height above ground level will trigger statutory consultation requirement.
- Development that might result in the creation of attractant environments for large and flocking bird species hazardous to aviation, including the potential for an environment attractive to hazardous bird species to be formed temporarily