Object

Representation ID: 155

Received: 09/03/2024

Respondent: Mrs Marie Jackson

There are other sites that should be developed before this one

Object

Representation ID: 324

Received: 03/04/2024

Respondent: Barrowby Parish Council

This development is wholly inside Barrowby Parish, it is not and has never been inside Grantham. As this is a glaring error in the document which affect a great many sub sections and the statistics that have been used to outline & justify certain policies we would ask that this error and therefore the accompanying text, statistics etc are all corrected before full publication.
Map 3.6
Section 12 statistics
12.21
12.58
All references to this development being a part of Grantham should be removed and revised

Object

Representation ID: 327

Received: 03/04/2024

Respondent: Barrowby Parish Council

This development is wholly inside Barrowby Parish, it is not and has never been inside Grantham. As this is a glaring error in the document which affect a great many sub sections and the statistics that have been used to outline & justify certain policies we would ask that this error and therefore the accompanying text, statistics etc are all corrected before full publication. Map 3.6 Section 12 statistics 12.21 12.58 All references to this development being a part of Grantham should be removed and revised

Object

Representation ID: 418

Received: 09/04/2024

Respondent: Barrowby Parish Council

This development is wholly inside the Parish of Barrowby. It is not, and has never been, inside Grantham. As this is a glaring error in the document which affects a great many sub sections and the statistics that have been used to outline & justify certain policies, the Parish Council would ask that this error and therefore the accompanying text, statistics etc are all corrected before full publication. Map 3.6 Section 12 statistics 12.21 12.58 All references to this development being a part of Grantham should be removed and revised.

Object

Representation ID: 1070

Received: 23/04/2024

Respondent: Dr Ray Butler

Shouldn’t be needed.

Support

Representation ID: 1896

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Grantham Estates

Agent: Savills

Support this allocation and remain committed to bringing the site forward for development at the earliest opportunity. Supports the draft criteria in the policy which reflect the work underway on the site and discussions to date through pre-application engagement. Grantham Estates have been actively seeking a development partner in relation to this site and are in the process of finalising an agreement with housebuilder Vistry North East Midlands. The site could deliver at least 87 dwellings.

Object

Representation ID: 1963

Received: 22/04/2024

Respondent: Natural England

We would reiterate the importance of establishing a connected network of high quality green infrastructure at the earliest stage of the planning process.

Support

Representation ID: 2363

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Defence Infrastructure Organisation Safeguarding Team

-Development of, or exceeding, 45.7m in height above ground level will trigger statutory consultation requirement,
- Development that might result in the creation of attractant environments for large and flocking bird species hazardous to aviation, including the potential for an environment attractive to hazardous bird species to be formed temporarily