Support

Representation ID: 179

Received: 09/03/2024

Respondent: Mrs Marie Jackson

No further comment

Object

Representation ID: 978

Received: 23/04/2024

Respondent: Mr Samal Parbat

I strongly oppose the housing development at Priory Farm, Deeping St James, due to its significant environmental and social impacts. This project threatens local wildlife and disrupts a conservation area, potentially harming ecosystems. The development could strain infrastructure, increase traffic, and alter community dynamics, impacting residents' quality of life. Furthermore, new housing units could clash visually with the existing landscape, detracting from the area's historical and cultural significance. As nearby residents, we are concerned about increased traffic, noise, and loss of privacy. Authorities should prioritise preserving our environment and community integrity over short-term development interests.

Object

Representation ID: 979

Received: 23/04/2024

Respondent: Mr Samal Parbat

I strongly oppose the housing development at Priory Farm, Deeping St James, due to its significant environmental and social impacts. This project threatens local wildlife and disrupts a conservation area, potentially harming ecosystems. The development could strain infrastructure, increase traffic, and alter community dynamics, impacting residents' quality of life. Furthermore, new housing units could clash visually with the existing landscape, detracting from the area's historical and cultural significance. As nearby residents, we are concerned about increased traffic, noise, and loss of privacy. Authorities should prioritise preserving our environment and community integrity over short-term development interests.

Object

Representation ID: 1082

Received: 24/04/2024

Respondent: Dr Ray Butler

Only acceptable if a true brownfield site, else should not happen

Object

Representation ID: 1134

Received: 24/04/2024

Respondent: Mr Somat Parbat

I strongly oppose the proposed housing development on Priory Farm in Deeping St James due to its potential negative impacts on local traffic, the environment, and residents' sewage systems. Introducing additional housing in this area could exacerbate traffic congestion, particularly on existing roadways ill-equipped to handle increased volume. Moreover, the strain on sewage systems from added households could lead to environmental issues and further impact the quality of life for nearby residents. It's crucial that authorities prioritise sustainable development practices and consider the long-term impacts on infrastructure and community well-being before approving such projects.

Object

Representation ID: 1182

Received: 24/04/2024

Respondent: Mr Krzysztof Kazmierczak

I oppose the proposed housing development due to strained amenities and environmental concerns in our small area. Existing services like schools and healthcare are already overburdened, and adding more housing will only exacerbate these issues. Moreover, cramming excessive housing into limited space threatens local community, green spaces, and air quality. This development overlooks the need for sustainable growth and risks compromising the quality of life for residents. I will object further, If I have to. We don't need this we don't want it.

Thank You

Object

Representation ID: 1214

Received: 24/04/2024

Respondent: Mr Mark Smitheringale

supported by land owners not residing near the proposed site and doing this for profit with no consideration for residents and no impact to themselves. Example SKPR-26. Green field plot enjoyed by locals for exercise, walking, wildlife and a connection to a green lane enjoyed by walkers horses, joggers etc this would be compromised by additional traffic from new homes. Development should be on Brown fields and not agricultural land.
Development of Deeping has been mismanaged and outstripped the capacity of its infrastructure which cannot cope including schools, health and leisure all of which are woefully inadequate.

Object

Representation ID: 1223

Received: 24/04/2024

Respondent: Mr Malanday Parbat

I strongly object to the proposed housing development near my home due to its detrimental impact on the environment and the strain it will place on our already underdeveloped infrastructure. This project fails to consider crucial factors such as increased traffic congestion, which will worsen air quality and pose safety risks. Our local infrastructure lacks the capacity to support additional housing. The local residents do not want this for our future.

Support

Representation ID: 1642

Received: 24/04/2024

Respondent: Market Deeping Town Council

A potentially acceptable site. We understand this allocation is supported by Deeping St James Parish Council.

Support

Representation ID: 1671

Received: 24/04/2024

Respondent: The Deepings Neighbourhood Plan Group

Support for principle of development but object to absence of important qualifications as follows.
- Should reference Back Lane as a ‘green or quiet lane’ (as previous site above SPPR-144 does).
-The site is on the edge of a conservation area and very close to the grade 1 Priory Church and Benedictine Priory. Design must reflect these leading aspects of local character.
-Protect key street tree (Willow) and verge on Broadgate Lane frontage
-There should be no access from Back Lane to protect the character of this rural route (see policy DNP 12.3).
-Site boundaries seem to incorrectly include highway verge (land is not registered so owner needs to confirm)
-Proximity to Priory Church and the Benedictine Priory

Support

Representation ID: 1696

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Deeping St James Parish Council

Support for principle of development but object to absence of important qualifications as follows.
- Should reference Back Lane as a ‘green or quiet lane’ (as previous site above SPPR-144 does).
-The site is on the edge of a conservation area and very close to the grade 1 Priory Church and Benedictine Priory. Design must reflect these leading aspects of local character.
-Protect key street tree (Willow) and verge on Broadgate Lane frontage
-There should be no access from Back Lane to protect the character of this rural route (see policy DNP 12.3).
-Site boundaries seem to incorrectly include highway verge (land is not registered so owner needs to confirm)
-Proximity to Priory Church and the Benedictine Priory

Object

Representation ID: 1726

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Historic England

Grade I Church of St James Grade II* Priory Farmhouse and Grade II table tombs adjacent to the church to the west of the site, together with the potential for archaeology (350078 to south, iron age gold coins and 3500059 St James Prior cell to west). Detailed assessment required.

Support

Representation ID: 1917

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Environment Agency

The Deepings WRC has been identified as having capacity issues. We have no concerns about the development at the Deepings due to it’s a small development. However, the data from the EDM installed in 2020 shows 103 spills from Storm tank at WwTW. The Deepings has a headroom of 453 which is equivalent to an estimated capacity of 1407 dwellings and the dry weather flow limits is approaching its limit with 4 out of 5 years above Q90. Additional flows could cause pollution to the River Welland (GB205031050685). We encourage the council to liaise with AWS and ensure that acceptable plans are in place for the management of foul water, in advance of planning permission being determined. We also encourage the council to be aware of the measures that would be required to be taken by AWS, to ensure that the additional flows from the development would be accommodated.

Support

Representation ID: 2373

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Defence Infrastructure Organisation Safeguarding Team

- Development of, or exceeding, 91.4m in height above ground level will trigger statutory consultation requirement,
- Development that might result in the creation of attractant environments for large and flocking bird species hazardous to aviation, including the potential for an environment attractive to hazardous bird species to be formed temporarily

Support

Representation ID: 2491

Received: 24/04/2024

Respondent: The Dean and Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford of the Foundation of King Henry the Eighth

Agent: Savills

Our Client is aware that this Regulation 18 version of the Local Plan proposes to allocate part of this site for housing.
The site is within a single ownership and is available for development. The site is therefore deliverable within the first five years of the new Local Plan. Our Client has developed a Responsible Ownership Policy for Property (ROPP) which is applied to development land within its control. This means that, from inception, there is a keen focus on environmental and social benefits for the local community.
The development is promoted to be a low carbon development, in design, delivery, use and future use.
Given our Client’s land interest in Deeping St James, the proposed allocation on Priory Farm Land at Policies H1 and SKPR-26 is fully supported. The support for this allocation is offered without prejudice to our Client’s overall position that these policies of the Local Plan should include the entire site as a new allocation. This can be done without any conflict with proposed Spatial Strategy.