Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan

Object

Representation ID: 1689

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Deeping St James Parish Council

Explanation needed. What are points of the compass assessments?

Support

Representation ID: 1690

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Deeping St James Parish Council

A welcome idea to link sites with their wider GI context.

Object

Representation ID: 1691

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Deeping St James Parish Council

Reword to offer clarity on where these are Building Reg issues. Not consistent with Climate Change chapter.

Object

Representation ID: 1692

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Deeping St James Parish Council

Reword to offer clarity on where these are Building reg issues. Not consistent with Climate Change chapter.

Support

Representation ID: 1693

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Deeping St James Parish Council

We note that standards might require increased open space of different types. This is where there are good reasons such as open space deficiency, the proper planning of an area, or other site specific circumstances, We suggest such clarity features in the text.

Object

Representation ID: 1694

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Deeping St James Parish Council

No reference made to the adopted DNP

Support

Representation ID: 1695

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Deeping St James Parish Council

Add reference to Deepings Green Walk (as you have done in SKPR-144 Millfield)

Support

Representation ID: 1696

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Deeping St James Parish Council

Support for principle of development but object to absence of important qualifications as follows.
- Should reference Back Lane as a ‘green or quiet lane’ (as previous site above SPPR-144 does).
-The site is on the edge of a conservation area and very close to the grade 1 Priory Church and Benedictine Priory. Design must reflect these leading aspects of local character.
-Protect key street tree (Willow) and verge on Broadgate Lane frontage
-There should be no access from Back Lane to protect the character of this rural route (see policy DNP 12.3).
-Site boundaries seem to incorrectly include highway verge (land is not registered so owner needs to confirm)
-Proximity to Priory Church and the Benedictine Priory

Object

Representation ID: 1697

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Deeping St James Parish Council

Action needed to align this policy SKLP with DNP policies.

Note there is no secondary frontage provision in the DNP. SKLP policy DEP2 should directly align with DNP policies (quoted in full below):
“1. The area identified on Map 5 is safeguarded for a potential extension to Market Deeping Town Centre boundary. All proposals within the existing boundary and the proposed extended area will be subject to the criteria in SKLP Policy DEP2.
2. Proposed changes of use of ground floor premises within the identified Market Deeping Town Centre from Class E (commercial, business and service uses), Class F1 (learning and non-residential uses) and Class F2
(local community uses) Use Classes to residential uses will only be supported where:
a) it can be demonstrated that there is no need for the existing use in the town centre; or
b) it can be demonstrated that the existing use is no longer economically viable and that appropriate marketing for its occupation by Use Classes E, F1 and F2 has been undertaken without an alternative commercial or acceptable town centre use being identified.”

Object

Representation ID: 1698

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Deeping St James Parish Council

Map is not correct see DNP page 47, Map 5.
The DNP Town Centre plan here needs to be graphically clearer and should be redrawn (please ask if you require a clearer plan than in the DNP).