Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan

Support

Representation ID: 2107

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Buckminster

It is noted and welcomed that under Summary of Proposed Changes (page 128) it is set out that: The final policy, will be informed by a Whole Plan Viability Assessment which will accompany the plan.

Support

Representation ID: 2108

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Buckminster

The new and revised standards of open space (compared to the adopted Local Plan Jan 2020) are all noted.

Object

Representation ID: 2109

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Buckminster

It may help clarity if the new references are referred to as on the plan on p157. This should include the Barracks site as it is equally large, proximate and substantially undevelopable without use of the road.

Object

Representation ID: 2110

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Buckminster

Suggests changes to the wording of the proposed policy.

Object

Representation ID: 2111

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Buckminster

Suggests changes to the wording of the proposed policy.

Object

Representation ID: 2112

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Buckminster

Object to the exclusion of Policy SKPR-220 in particular to the Local Plan as a shorter-term opportunity.

Object

Representation ID: 2113

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Buckminster

Objects to the exclusion of SKPR-104 as a longer-term opportunity for later in the plan period.

Object to SKPR-219 being excluded from the plan as an Employment site.

Object

Representation ID: 2114

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Buckminster

Supports the allocation but considers that it should be a larger allocation.

Object

Representation ID: 2115

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Buckminster

We cannot see an up to date rationale for the Mixed Use allocation at Grantham Station. We are aware of an old feasibility study and consider it would be helpful to know this is updated and publicly shared. We do not consider it practical for parts of the extensive car parks to have employment uses on part, nor it affordable to build two storey car parks. We do not see the vision for an area of recently resurfaced car park being a place travellers will wish to dwell. We see investment better directed to enhanced footpath and cycle routes, with landscaping, to get people easily and safely towards the High Street and Westgate. The only proposal that may make sense is a modern office building, but we know there have been previous false starts seeking to move the tyre and building merchant operators.

Object

Representation ID: 2148

Received: 25/04/2024

Respondent: Buckminster

Site SKPR-234 should be allocated for additional employment land.