Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan

Search representations

Results for Jelson Homes Ltd search

New search New search

Object

Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan

Chapter 2 - South Kesteven District

Representation ID: 662

Received: 19/04/2024

Respondent: Jelson Homes Ltd

Representation Summary:

The plan period is unambitious in looking to the bare minimum period of 15 years from adoption (2036) and includes no allowance for slippage. the period should be extended to 2046.

Object

Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan

The Built Environment

Representation ID: 663

Received: 19/04/2024

Respondent: Jelson Homes Ltd

Representation Summary:

The reference to buildings here is extremely vague and further detail should be provided. How is this 40% broken down between buildings within different uses - e.g, industrial, commercial and residential. Without this level of detail policies aimed at addressing this are meaningless.

Object

Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan

The issue for South Kesteven

Representation ID: 666

Received: 19/04/2024

Respondent: Jelson Homes Ltd

Representation Summary:

Whilst the principal of addressing climate change is supported, the Government has made clear through its written ministerial statement of 13 December 2023 that it is not the role of Local Plans to set local energy efficiency standards for buildings that go beyond current or planned building regulations. This advice needs to be reflected in the scope of any climate change study and any subsequent policies that flow from it.

Object

Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan

SP1: Spatial Strategy

Representation ID: 668

Received: 19/04/2024

Respondent: Jelson Homes Ltd

Representation Summary:

The principal of applying a buffer of 20% to help provide flexibility in delivery of the minimum housing requirement is supported, however, this needs to be incorporated as a formal part of policy SP1 with the minimum expressed as the 14,020 + 20% (i.e.16,284)

Support

Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan

SP2: Settlement HierarchyIn

Representation ID: 669

Received: 19/04/2024

Respondent: Jelson Homes Ltd

Representation Summary:

The settlement hierarchy and particularly the continued focus on Grantham for the majority growth is supported.

Object

Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan

Delivering New Homes

Representation ID: 672

Received: 19/04/2024

Respondent: Jelson Homes Ltd

Representation Summary:

As per comments made elsewhere the plan period should be adjusted to 2046 and the housing requirement adjusted accordingly.

Support

Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan

H1: Housing AllocationsThe

Representation ID: 676

Received: 19/04/2024

Respondent: Jelson Homes Ltd

Representation Summary:

Jelson supports the allocations at Rectory Farm Phases 2 & 3 (GR3-H2 & GR3-H3)

Support

Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan

H2: Affordable Housing Contributions

Representation ID: 677

Received: 19/04/2024

Respondent: Jelson Homes Ltd

Representation Summary:

The Policy is supported in principal but there will need to be further consideration given once the Whole Plan Viability Study has been completed. The option for sites specific viability appraisals for sites under GR3 is also supported given the significant infrastructure burden required to deliver these sites.

Object

Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan

H4: Meeting All Housing Needs

Representation ID: 678

Received: 19/04/2024

Respondent: Jelson Homes Ltd

Representation Summary:

It should be made clear that the market mix set out in Table 4 will be used as a guide only to monitoring District Wide housing provision and not be used as a fixed requirement to be rigidly delivered on every site. The market mix for any given site needs to be determined using a range of factors, including local need, local character and market intelligence.

Planning policies that seek to secure a proportion of M4(2) dwellings need to be evidenced in terms of the local need for such an approach.

Object

Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan

H3: Self and Custom Build Housing

Representation ID: 680

Received: 19/04/2024

Respondent: Jelson Homes Ltd

Representation Summary:

The evidence of need for self-build and the types of locations sought needs to be robust. The incorporation of self-build into large mainstream housing sites raises significant logistical, health and safety and security issues and is not considered an appropriate approach.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.